Despite
making claims that FRETILIN would win an outright majority on the recent 7 July
national election Mari Alkatiri Secretary General Of FRETILIN is now dealing
with a different reality.
According
to a senior FRETILIN leader is told TEMPO SEMANAL that FRETILIN has been trying
for two days to gain access to the Xanana Gusmao, President of CNRT which got
the most votes. This source has informed
Tempo Semanal that FRETILIN is trying to open a discussion about how FRETILIN
can make a coalition government with CNRT.
FRETILIN
seeking coalition so as to gain access to legislative powers to help change the
constitution and pass a number of laws.
While
Xanana’s allies the PD and Frente Mudanca party leadership have already met
with Xanana the day after the election, FRETILIN remains locked out. PD and
Frente Mudanca are old allies of Xanana in the previous AMP government.
According to some analysts PD and Frente Mudanca have more chance at forming a coalition
with Xanana’s CNRT to establish a new coalition Government. This is due to the fact that FRETILIN and
Alkatiri have long opposed Xanana’s Strategic Development plan. But according
to Tempo Semanal sources within FRETILIN the party's leadership is now looking
to push Alkatiri to agree with Xanana's Development plan.
While
FRETILIN has increased is Parliamentary seats from 21 to 24 Xanana’s CNRT party
has increased more to a total of 30 seats and has moved from second most voted
party in 2007 to first most voted party in 2012.
The
following is an exclusive interview between Tempo Semanal and Mari Alkatiri
conducted on 9 July 2012.
TS:
During the FRETILIN campaign for the parliamentary elections you repeatedly
called for an end to attacks on XANANA GUSMAO, why has your party changed its
policy?
MA. We did
not really call for an end on criticism of XANANA. But I do believe that the
leaders of our generation need to hand over power to the next generation. We
should not just hand over power but also show a good example to the next
generation. We need to show a good example, in order to think about the way
forward. Sooner or later we have to hand political power and leadership to the
new generation. Not only goodwill. It’s not enough. But we need to set a good
example. It is about the day-to-day life of practicing politics, and not just
about attacking each other as enemies. We are not enemies. Of course we not
think in the same way. This is part of the democracy. We have to
think about the interest of the people and the interest of the nation.
TS: Is
this a new maneuver to save your party?
MA:
I am not speaking on behalf of the party. But we came from the same roots and
with the same beliefs. And we have the same objectives. This is the point.
Parties are important for our democracy. But we need to think of the future
of the nation, in such a way we can really free the people from poverty.
Our new cause is how to combat poverty and free the people from poverty. I
think we (1974 generation) are not more than three to five people. We really
need to hand over everything to the new generation.
TS: Do
you mean the 1974-generation like Ramos HORTA and XANANA?
MA: Yes.
Ramos HORTA and myself are the founders of this nation. The other
founders have passed away recently. He is Francisco Xavier do AMARAL. XANANA
GUSMAO is a person whom since 1979 to 1999 led the resistance until the end of
our struggle. Of course he joined FRETILIN in 1975, and he lead the
resistance for more then 20 years. It is s very important to have this
generation from 1974 and 1975 to be able to think about the future of the
nation without us.
TS: Do
you mean you are seeking a coalition between the leadership of the older
generation?
MA: I am
not looking for a coalition to lead the government. But I am looking for a
coalition of good ideas and good will. I am looking for a coalition of
objectives or targets.
TS: Is
there any response from Mr. XANANA to your proposal? If not what are you going
to do to convince XANANA to accept your offer?
MA:
I will keep repeating my appeal. Of course I think XANANA is a person of good
will. He is also a dreamer for the best of our people. And I do still believe
that immediately after the election we will sit together and try to think about
it.
TS: If
the 1974 and 1975 generation can’t accept your idea what would be the
consequences to the founders of this nation?
MA:
It means we fail. This is really a failure from our side. And then
soon or later our people will reject us.
TS:
People are discussing the possibility of coalition between FRETILIN and CNRT in
time to prevent the history of 2007. But some do not believe that FRETILIN and
CNRT will be able to sit in the same table of council ministers. What are your
feelings on this?
MA: I
think we can’t really make this kind of equation of the historic leaders to be
away from a political power and to support or assist those one going to govern
the country. It’s not easy for us to have coalition with every political
party. But one thing has to be respected. The winner has to lead
the coalition and not the second place party. This is the point if we are to
respect the will of the people. The winner
is to lead a coalition.
TS: How
to prevent the 2007 scenario which FRETILIN was not able make a coalition with
any party and the President invited the second most voted party which able to
form a coalition to establish a Government. People are arguing that the
constitution is vague and there is no time frame set so as to allow people to
interpret it according to their own way. What’s your interpretation?
MA:
For me my interpretation of the constitutions is clear. The most voted party
has to be invited by the President of the Republic to lead the government. If
it fails to be able to create a coalition then the President has the opportunity
to invite others or the second most voted party to do so. But the
President cannot choose the second most voted party before allowing the first
most voted the opportunity to establish a coaltion.
TS: So
what happened in 2007 was that FRETILIN as the first most voted party was not
given the chance to form the government but President called in the second most
voted party which was able to form a coalition for government in that time.
MA:
Yes. It was unconstitutional.
2 comments:
I thinks TS needs to understand what the proper English. The word Then and than are totally having different meaning. In this Article I found there were misleading word such this pasage " Alkateri is told TS" this is wrong, it should only be Alkateri told TS. And obviouslly there are couples mistakes in expressions. This blog is live blog so need to write in concise way as it is written by a real journalist.
Thanks.
re: "Anonymous"
Your own English is MUCH worse than that of the TS writer or translator.
Im a native English speaker and in fact I didnt even notice any obvious errors in the original news story. Your nasty little comment on the other hand was SO POORLY CONJUGATED, which I would usually find utterly irrelevant, if it werent for the fact that your whole point was making a big deal out of language errors.
Even if you could write in perfect UK English, that wouldnt give you the right to belittle others according to their grammar.
Theres no such thing as "proper English"! Ei! What kind of person cares more about spelling mistakes than the next 5 years of Timorese governance?!
Post a Comment